Ross, Cody T., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung-Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, . “Correction to: ‘Greater money inequality, shorter polygyny: rethinking brand new polygyny tolerance model’.” Record of your Royal Neighborhood program 15 (147): 20180752.
Sellen, Daniel W., and Daniel J. Hruschka. 2004. “Extracted-dining resource-protection polygyny inside local western united states Societies within contact.” Most recent anthropology 45 (5): 707–14. Silas, Ellis. 1926. A primitive Arcadia. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd. Spencer, Herbert. 1876. Prices regarding Sociology: Vol. step one. London: Appleton.
Starkweather, Katherine Age., and you will Raymond Hames. 2012. “A survey out-of Non-Classical Polyandry.” Human nature 23 (2): 149–72. Textor, Robert B. 1967. A corner-Social Bottom line. The Haven, CT: HRAF Push.
White, Douglas R., and Michael L. Burton. 1988. “Causes of Polygyny: Environment, Discount, Kinship, and Warfare.” American anthropologist ninety (4): 871–87.
Whiting, John W. Meters. 1964. “Aftereffects of climate into certain cultural methods.” Into the Explorations for the Cultural Anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, modified of the Ward Search Goodenough, 511–49. New york, NY: McGraw-Mountain.
Whiting, John W. M., and Beatrice B. Whiting. 1975. “Aloofness and you may Closeness out of Husbands and Spouses: A combination-Cultural Investigation.” Ethos step 3 (2): 183–207.
- Brand new numbers come from brand new Ethnographic Atlas Murdock (1962–1971) once the recovered from within the D-Set.org (Kirby mais aussi al. 2016) ??
- These figures depend on data about Simple Cross Cultural Try that happen to be coded by Broude and you can Greene (1985) ; these types of research on marriage had been retrieved out of D-Put adjustable SCCS739. Of the 148 communities on the Important Get across Social Sample and therefore Broude and you can Green coded 30.1% has full personal selection, 17.6% keeps private options that requires parental approval, step three.4% enjoys individual choice that can require parental plan, 18.2% possess often personal solutions otherwise set up marriage, sixteen.9% provides set-up relationship, but folks have the capability to target, and you may a dozen.8% has fully put up matrimony.??
- The brand new numbers inside part along with the new Profile try based on data from the Important Get across-Cultural Try (Murdock and you will Light 1969) ; such data to the polygyny was basically recovered off D-Put varying SCCS211. The standard Mix-Social Shot (SCCS) try an example from 185 communities. Data on SCCS along with informed the new integrated cake graph lower than.??
- There are just 2 polyandrous communities on the SCCS.??
- Of the various variety of polygyny, restricted are most typical, followed closely by nonsororal polygyny, and then sororal polygyny.??
- A cross-types study of mammals and you may wild birds Yards. Ember and you may Ember (1979) learned that an excessive amount of females along with forecast polygynous in the place of monogamous connection. Specific studies have maybe not located support on the sex proportion concept, but methods out-of polygyny have been more (Hooper 2006; Quinlan and you will Quinlan 2007) or adjustable is actually imputed (Minocher, Duda, and you may Jaeggi 2019) .??
On the Individual Affairs Urban area Data
Human Relationships Town Files, Inc. ( HRAF ) try an internationally accepted organization in the field of cultural anthropology. Their purpose should be to encourage and you will support the cross-cultural study of person community, area and you may decisions before and provide.
EHRAF Database
- eHRAF Industry Cultures
- eHRAF Archaeology
Contact HRAF
- Tel: 203-764-9401
The usual way to shot concepts is to try to examine societies which have and you may versus a customary trait to see if the fresh new variation was Vietnamesisch VersandhandelsbrГ¤ute forecast of the type inside the a thought causal factor. When you’re such as for example assessment can not be presented in the place of version to review, behavior various other creature kinds could possibly get shed light on such theories. Obviously, we can not mention relationships in other species, however, we could look at varieties with a few stability inside male-feminine mating and compare them with types without having one balance.
In other cultures, societal identification regarding matrimony is founded on a successful trial several months. The Guarani out of South america habit demonstration wedding, where official relationship techniques try deferred up until pursuing the prospective groom demonstrates his suitability to possess wedding. Schaden and you may Lewinsohn (1962) informs us that
Community exogamy/endogamy
Of several anthropological profile declaration jealousy certainly one of co-spouses. ) discover that in about 90% of your own communities which have co-wives, ethnographers declaration sexual and you will mental argument plus they conclude one to disagreement is more-or-quicker a universal within the polygynous communities. Polygynous societies seem to have responded to envy which have specific popular customs and you can statutes that come with: having separate home and you will kitchen areas getting nonsororal co-wives, having rules on husbands sharing resources equitably, and achieving regulations to possess sleep which have co-wives from inside the rotation (C. R. Ember, Ember, and Peregrine 2019, 245) . Given big jealousy, some anthropologists see it puzzling that polygyny is so commonplace (age.grams., Meters. Ember (1974) ).
Are there structural points that can assist us be the cause of different divorce case costs? However some look supports the idea one to communities which have matrilocal house be more open-minded of separation and divorce (Minturn, Grosse, and Haider 1969) , most other research does not find the relationship instance solid when almost every other affairs was managed (Ackerman 1963; Pearson and Hendrix 1979) . Ackerman (1963) shows that the levels to which a spouse was incorporated into a great society’s ancestry framework is much more predictive. Particularly incorporation will be before elizabeth area, or it does exist immediately after relationships, eg becoming taken care of of the a beneficial ily. Ackerman (1963) discovers that
Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and you may Dowry within the Africa and Eurasia.” From inside the Bridewealth and you will Dowry, edited from the Jack Goody and you will S. J. Tambiah, 1–58. Cambridge Paperwork for the Public Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Drive.
